We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Research Seminar "Problems of Scientific Research in Art and Culture"

2024/2025
Academic Year
ENG
Instruction in English
3
ECTS credits
Course type:
Compulsory course
When:
1 year, 3, 4 module

Instructor

Course Syllabus

Abstract

Research seminar is an active form of learning to obtain professional skills. It is arranged on a regular basis and focuses on introduction to principles and methods of an academic study in the field of arts and culture management
Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

  • This course aims to introduce students to the development of an academic paper. It focuses on the research process, from choosing a research topic and defining research motivation, developing a research question, a literature review and a theoretical framework, working on research design and presentation of the results
Expected Learning Outcomes

Expected Learning Outcomes

  • Be able to conduct scientific research
  • be able to critically and argumentatively analyze scientific research
  • be able to present the results of their research, answer the questions of reviewers and argue the proposed ideas
  • Know and be able to build a research design
  • to be able to define research niche and select relevant literature
  • to know how to choose appropriate research methods
  • to know how to pose a research question
  • to efficiently use electronic citation databases to apply the guidelines of development of a research paper to writing a term paper
  • - to identify major research gaps in the field of creative industries - to critically evaluate research papers
  • - to develop an extended research proposal based on the guidelines for a research paper development - to advance the research paper presentation skilss - to critically evaluate research projects
Course Contents

Course Contents

  • Introduction to research projects
  • Development of a Research Paper: sources of ideas and data
  • Research motivation and Literature review
  • Research gaps in creative industries
  • Research Proposals Discussion
  • Development of Theoretical Framework
  • Data and Research methods
  • Results and conclusion
  • Pre-defense of the term papers
Assessment Elements

Assessment Elements

  • non-blocking Analytical review of research papers
    The students are expected to analytically read and discuss research papers that have high relevance to their term papers
  • non-blocking Presentation of Research Proposal
    The students are to present the research motivation, justify research gaps and align it with relevant academic literature
  • non-blocking Pre-defence
    Students are to present their work in progress
  • non-blocking Final test
  • non-blocking Discussion of the research papers
  • non-blocking Research pitch
    The students should present their research in a 3-min challenge
Interim Assessment

Interim Assessment

  • 2024/2025 4th module
    0.1 * Analytical review of research papers + 0.1 * Discussion of the research papers + 0.2 * Final test + 0.25 * Pre-defence + 0.2 * Presentation of Research Proposal + 0.15 * Research pitch
Bibliography

Bibliography

Recommended Core Bibliography

  • Calhoun, C. J. (2010). Robert K. Merton : Sociology of Science and Sociology As Science. New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=384868
  • Cooper, I. D. (2015). How to write an original research paper (and get it published)I. Diane Cooper, AHIP. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.2.001
  • Elsbach, K. D., & Knippenberg, D. (2020). Creating High‐Impact Literature Reviews: An Argument for “Integrative Reviews.” Journal of Management Studies (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 57(6), 1277–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12581
  • Gáliková, S. (2016). Academic Writing : Selected Topics in Writing an Academic Paper. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1235840
  • Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for Your “House.” Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12–26. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1058505
  • Knopf, J. W. (2006). Doing a Literature Review. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.6DDBE740
  • Lancaster, G. (2005). Research Methods in Management. Amsterdam: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=195596
  • Mario D’Arco, Letizia Lo Presti, Vittoria Marino, & Riccardo Resciniti. (2019). Embracing AI and Big Data in customer journey mapping: from literature review to a theoretical framework. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.15(4).2019.09
  • Research methods in management, , 2011
  • Susan B. Smith. (2012). A Guide for Writing APA Style Research Papers. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.BCE37201

Recommended Additional Bibliography

  • Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. MPRA Paper.
  • Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.86A0B01A
  • Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
  • Reybold, L. E. (2009). Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(3), 267–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713609332386
  • Saris, W. E. (2014). Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research (Vol. Second Edition). Hoboken: Wiley. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=691292
  • The sociology of science : theoretical and empirical investigations, Merton, R. K., 1973
  • Young, S. M. (1999). Field Research Methods in Management Accounting. Accounting Horizons, 13(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.1.76
  • Радаев, В. В. (2013). How to write an academic paper ; Как написать академический текст. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.E43119D2

Authors

  • Okulova Olga Igorevna
  • Budko Viktoriia Aleksandrovna