• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Article
Gender (Im)Balance in the Russian Cinema: On the Screen and behind the Camera

Xenia Leontyeva, Koltsova O., Verhoeven D.

Journal of Cultural Analytics. 2024. Vol. 9. No. 1.

Book chapter
Psychological Aspects of Face-To-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Interpersonal Communication: An Integrative Review

Tsigeman E., Larisa Mararitsa, Gundelah O. et al.

In bk.: Social Computing and Social Media.16th International Conference, SCSM 2024, Held as Part of the 26th HCI International Conference, HCII 2024, Washington, DC, USA, June 29–July 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part III. Vol. 14705. Springer, 2024. P. 29-48.

Working paper
Difficulty overdose? Inconclusive effect of the disfluent font on reading in second language

Tsigeman E., Likhanov M., Kalinnikova L. et al.

00. 00. PsyArXiv Preprints, 2024

Any publications? Yes, please

Nadezda Nartova with Francesca Stella published an article on sexuality in modern Russia

Any publications? Yes, please

An article was published in Sexuality, citizenship and belonging: trans/national and intersectional perspectives, London:  Routledge 2016 under a title: “Sexual citizenship, nationalism and biopolitics in Putin’s Russia” 

In Putin’s Russia, restrictions on sexual and reproductive rights are justified on both pragmatic and ideological grounds. On a practical level, they are advocated in the name of the national interest and of the state’s biopolitical aims of increasing the population and improving its health. Restrictions on abortion are intended to boost the birth rate and optimise women’s reproductive capabilities; the ‘gay propaganda’ law is meant to contribute to the healthy psychological and moral development of Russia’s younger generations by strengthening ‘traditional’ family values. On an ideological level, these restrictions construct specific models of motherhood, relationships and family as legitimate and ‘traditionally’ Russian. Pragmatic reasons and moral values are deeply intertwined, particularly in the case of reproductive rights: pronatalist policies deploy pro-life rhetoric and construct motherhood as simultaneously a moral issue, a patriotic duty and as a public concern. Importantly, the meaning of Russian ‘traditional values’ is constructed in opposition to European ‘sexual democracy’ (Fassin 2010), particularly in relation to same-sex relationships. Internationally, Russia increasingly presents itself on the international stage as a stronghold of social conservatism and the defender of traditional family values (Wilkinson 2014), whilst domestically, these very values are deployed to shore-up specific notions about Russian national identity. A vision of the Russian nation as an ‘imagined community’ built on tradition and biological kinship promotes specific sexual and gender normativities. Women are valued first and foremost as reproducers of the nation, although not all models of motherhood and family relationships are equally legitimised. Non-heterosexual citizens are constructed as deviant